The Texas Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA) became law on June 16, 2023. Texas becomes the 11th state to enact a comprehensive consumer data privacy law, joining California, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, Utah, Iowa, Indiana, Tennessee, Montana, and Florida (with Oregon soon to be the 12th). Having a total population in excess of 30 million people, Texas will be the second-largest state, after California, to enact such legislation. Considering the number of residents in the 11 states with comprehensive privacy laws so far, close to 40 percent of the entire U.S. population will have access to new state consumer rights regarding their personal data. Companies need to be aware of the applicable state resident, data, and revenue thresholds and be ready to respond to a potential wave of data subject requests, while also effectively navigating the web of complex compliance and reporting obligations.
The TDPSA, which takes effect on July 1, 2024, except for global opt-out technology provisions that take effect on January 1, 2025,[1] is similar to the state privacy laws in Virginia, Utah, and Iowa (among others) that are generally more "business-friendly" relative to laws such as those in California and Colorado. Businesses that have prepared to comply with these other state privacy laws should be well-positioned to comply with the TDPSA. Even so, the TDPSA contains several notable provisions that companies should consider when developing their privacy compliance programs.
The TDPSA applies to persons that:
Unlike the privacy laws in Virginia, Utah, Iowa, and elsewhere, the TDPSA has no specific thresholds based on annual revenue or volume of personal data processed.
Companies may find that determining whether they qualify as a "small business" under SBA regulations is surprisingly complicated. The SBA does not have a single definition for a "small business." Instead, definitions of "small business" by the SBA vary widely from one industry vertical to the next.[4]
Similar to other state privacy laws, the TDPSA imposes specific obligations on data "controllers"—those that determine the purposes and means of processing personal data—including:
Consistent with most other state data privacy laws, the TDPSA contains entity-level, data-specific, and employment-related exemptions. Additionally, the TDPSA only protects consumers acting in an individual or household capacity, meaning it is also not applicable in business-to-business (B2B) contexts. Other exempted entities and data types are summarized below.
Entity-level exemptions:
Data-specific exemptions:
Employment-related exemption:
Processing-related exemptions:
The TDPSA does not restrict a controller's or processor's ability to:
Additionally, the statutory requirements imposed on a controller or processor under the TDPSA do not apply if compliance would require violating an evidentiary privilege under Texas law or the disclosure of a trade secret, or "adversely affect[ ] the rights or freedoms of any person, including the right of free speech."
The TDPSA narrowly defines "consent" as a clear affirmative act signifying a consumer's freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous agreement to process personal data relating to the consumer. The term includes a written statement, including a statement written by electronic means, or any other unambiguous affirmative action. The Texas law expressly does not recognize the following as viable forms of consent:
Like other state privacy laws, the TDPSA defines the term "biometric data" as data generated by automatic measurements of an individual's biological characteristics, such as fingerprint, voiceprint, eye retina or iris, or other unique biological patterns or characteristics (perhaps including "faceprints," although they are not mentioned explicitly). The term expressly excludes physical and digital photographs as well as video or audio recordings, and any data generated therefrom. This exclusion is similar to ones found in other state privacy laws' definitions of biometric data. However, this exclusion distinguishes the TDPSA from the Illinois biometrics law,[9] which, while generally exempting photographs and video and audio recordings, applies to scans of facial geometry created from photographs.[10] Biometric data is characterized as "sensitive data" under the TDPSA (see below) only when "processed for the purpose of uniquely identifying an individual."
Like most other state privacy laws, the TDPSA prohibits businesses from collecting and processing "sensitive data" without obtaining the consumer's consent (or the parent's consent if under 13). The TDPSA defines "sensitive data" as personal data revealing:
As noted above, if the sensitive data pertains to a known child, compliance with the COPPA (verifiable parental consent) is required.
The TDPSA defines "sale of personal data" as the "sharing, disclosing, or transferring of personal data for monetary or other valuable consideration by the controller to a third party." As a result, the Texas definition tracks with California's broader definition of "sale," as compared to the narrower definition under Virginia's privacy law, which only applies to disclosures of personal data "for monetary consideration" and not "other valuable" consideration.
TDPSA's definition of a "sale" excludes any disclosure to an affiliate of the controller, the controller's processor, for the purpose of providing a requested product or service, in a merger or acquisition of the controller's business or assets, or of information that the consumer intentionally made public via mass media.
As with other state privacy laws, the TDPSA provides consumers the right to confirm the processing of and obtain access to the consumer's personal data; request that a controller correct inaccuracies in the consumer's personal data; delete personal data about the consumer; and if available in digital format, obtain a copy of the data "the consumer previously provided to the controller" in a portable and readily usable format "that allows the consumer to transmit the data to another controller without hindrance."
The TDPSA requires covered businesses to establish two or more secure and accessible methods (through the website or by email in specified circumstances) for consumers to submit authenticated requests to exercise their rights with respect to their personal data. Responses to consumer requests are due within 45 days of receipt, subject to a 45-day extension, when reasonably necessary. Controllers must provide information in response to a consumer's request "at least twice annually per consumer" and free of charge, unless the request is "manifestly unfounded, excessive, or repetitive."
The TDPSA also provides that any provision of a contract or agreement that waives or limits consumer rights is void and unenforceable.
The TDPSA requires controllers to conduct and document data protection assessments for certain types of processing that pose heightened risks to consumers. The assessments must identify and weigh the benefits of the processing to the controller, consumer, other stakeholders, and the public, against the potential risks to the consumer (while also taking into consideration any mitigating safeguards that could reduce those risks).[11] The categories that require assessments are identical to those required by Connecticut's privacy law, including:
Data protection assessments conducted to comply with comparable requirements of other laws or regulations (such as other states' privacy laws) will satisfy the requirements of the TDPSA. Data protection assessments must cover processing activities occurring only after the law's effective date and do not need to be retroactive (some state privacy laws require such assessments to cover processing activities occurring for a period prior to the law's effective date).
The TDPSA incorporates data governance principles, including purpose limitation and reasonable security practices. Furthermore, controllers are prohibited from collecting additional categories of personal information or using collected information for additional purposes, unless they've obtained a consumer's consent.
The TDPSA uses a controller-processor framework and requires that controllers and processors—those that process personal data on a controller's behalf—enter into agreements that include terms that are standard under other state privacy laws, including clear instructions for processing data, the nature and purpose of processing, the type of data processed, the duration of processing, and the rights and obligations of both parties, including confidentiality of personal information, contracts with sub-processors, deletion or return of personal data upon termination of the agreement, and cooperation with reasonable assessments by the controller.
The Texas attorney general has exclusive authority to enforce the TDPSA, though – in contrast to California, Colorado, and Florida – Texas does not provide any rulemaking authority. The Texas attorney general may levy civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation and seek injunctive relief as well as attorney's fees and other expenses incurred in investigating and bringing an action for violations.
There is no private right of action afforded to consumers for violations under the TDPSA or "any other law."
Before commencing an action to enforce the TDPSA, the Texas attorney general must notify the person of the specific provisions alleged to have been violated. Following that notice, there will be a 30-day "cure" period within which the person can correct the violation. If the violation is cured, no enforcement action can be brought.
To properly "cure" under the TDPSA, the person must provide the attorney general a written statement within the 30-day period that the person: cured the alleged violation; notified the consumer that the consumer's privacy violation was addressed, if the consumer's contact information has been made available to the person; provided supporting documentation to show how the privacy violation was cured; and made changes to internal policies, if necessary, to ensure that no such further violations will occur.
The right to cure has no sunset provision and would remain a permanent part of the law, which is in contrast to states such as Colorado, Connecticut, Montana, and others where the cure period sunsets after a number of years.
The TDPSA will go into effect the same time as the recently enacted Florida Digital Bill of Rights (which is actually prior to four other states that recently passed consumer data privacy laws earlier in 2023).
The seven state privacy laws enacted so far in 2023 are slated to go into effect as follows:
Laws in Oregon and Delaware, if signed as currently presented to their governors, would be effective July 1, 2024, and January 1, 2025, respectively.
DWT's Privacy and Security team regularly counsels clients on how their business practices can comply with state privacy laws. We will continue to monitor the rapid development of other new state and federal privacy laws and regulations.
[1] Section 541.055(e) will give consumers the right to designate an agent for purposes of opting out of processing and using a global opt-out setting on January 1, 2025.
[2] The term "sensitive data" includes personal data revealing an individual's racial or ethnic origin, religious beliefs, mental or physical health diagnosis, sexual orientation, citizenship or immigration status, genetic or biometric data processed for the purpose of uniquely identifying an individual, personal data collected from a known child, and precise geolocation data. Although biometric data is included within the definition of "sensitive" data, its inclusion is limited to when it is "processed for the purpose of uniquely identifying an individual." If not used for uniquely identifying an individual, it is not "sensitive" data, but still biometric data subject to the data sale notice provision.
[3] "Targeted advertising" means "displaying to a consumer an advertisement that is selected based on personal data obtained from that consumer's activities over time and across nonaffiliated websites or online applications to predict the consumer's preferences or interests." The term expressly excludes advertising based on a consumer's activities on the controller's website, current search query, website, or online application visit (not limited to "affiliated" websites but not including "activities" on the visited website or application), or in response to a consumer request for information. The term also excludes the "processing of personal data solely for measuring or reporting advertising performance, reach, or frequency."
[4] To properly assess whether a business qualifies as "small" in the eyes of the SBA, an array of tools and assessments can be used. For example, the SBA offers a "Size Standards Tool" utilizing economic activity measurements based on the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS).
[5] See note 3, above, for the TDPSA's definition of "targeted advertising."
[6] The TDPSA defines a "decision that produces a legal or similarly significant effect concerning the consumer" as "a decision made by the controller that results in the provision or denial by the controller of: (A) financial and lending services; (B) housing, insurance, or health care services; (C) education enrollment; (D) employment opportunities; (E) criminal justice; or (F) access to basic necessities, such as food and water."
[7] As all are defined in Section 31.002 of the Texas Utilities Code.
[8] "Dark Patterns" means a "user interface designed or manipulated with the effect of substantially subverting or impairing user autonomy, decision-making, or choice," as well as any practice designated as such by the Federal Trade Commission.
[9] Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14/10 (2018).
[10] Sosa v. Onfido, 600 F.Supp.3d 859, 873 (N.D. Ill. 2022); Rivera v. Google, Inc., 238 F.Supp.3d 1088, 1095-1100 (N.D. Ill. 2017).
[11] Items to be considered as mitigating safeguards include the use of deidentified data, the reasonable expectations of consumers, the context of the processing, and the relationship between the controller and the consumer whose personal data will be processed.